Neat. Most of it makes sense. I woudl assume the system somehow weights the votes - so a 5 and a 1 don't really count as a full 5 and a full 1, because all your family/friend/5sap will vote 5, and then I'm sure there are people surfing that just vote 1, 1, 1, 1 - have you ever gone to HotorNot.com? It's just like that, only slower

No one can talk about this (it's the first rule of metacafe), but being a non-employee, I would guess that the system will count the "view" after a % of the video is complete. It's safe to say that most videos reach their climax, the point of the video, maybe 80-90% into it, and the rest is credits or other some such. So perhaps a viewer has to watch the video for at least 75% of the way before the view counts. It would be silly for them to count every view that clicks for 1% of the time, but equally silly to force peopel to watch the entire thing, when a lot of the end is pointless.
Large drops in ratings can be attributed to a lack of updates to the database from the backbone app.
So, here's my question then.... I asked in another post, but it's more apprpriate here. One video went to public distribution in about 10 minutes. But it also had a rating on it. My other videos have been viewed more, but have no rating. Is it safe to say that without the rating, it won't be going into "public distribution"?
So many questions, but I really like to understand these things

Andrew Slater